Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Posey v. Commonwealth

Kentucky Supreme Court

Decided February 23, 2006No. 2004-SC-0060-DGPublished

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partScott, Justice

I concur in the majority’s opinion regarding the Fourth Amendment issue, but I dissent on the constitutional rights of “self-defense” and to “bear arms.”

It is simply wrong to arrest, charge and convict Kentuckians of “felony crimes” for keeping a weapon in their own home— without any evidence the weapon was intended to be used for unlawful purposes. Such a practice violates all of our rights to “bear arms in defense of [ourselves and others]” and our rights of self-defense. See Ky. Const. § 1(1, 7). Thus, I write *184separately to remind Kentuckians of what our forefathers left us in the Bill of…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Printz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  2. United States v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  3. Republican Party of Minnesota v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  4. United States v. EmersonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2001
  5. United States v. Harvey Lloyd NapierCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API