Eide v. Skerbeck
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtFowler, J.
As appears from the foregoing statement, the actions were brought by an infant and her father to- recover their respective damages sustained as a result of the daughter’s falling over a tent stake alleged to have been negligently placed by defendants Joseph and Eugene W. Skerbeck. The defendants claim that the findings of the jury, which are set forth in the statement preceding the opinion, are not supported by the evidence. These findings are numbered in the preceding statement from (1) to'(7). Finding (1) is so plainly so supported, and findings (4) and (7) are so plainly supported if…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Pinney v. Providence Loan & Investment Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1900
- Easler v. Downie Amusement Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1926
- Emerson v. Riverview Rink & BallroomWisconsin Supreme Court · 1940
- Phillips v. Wisconsin State Agricultural SocietyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1884
- State ex rel. Ashley v. Circuit Court for Milwaukee CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1935
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Miller v. SmithWisconsin Supreme Court · 1981
- Rouillard v. Canadian Klondike Club, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944
- City of Madison v. PierceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1954
- Covey v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1951
- Karns v. Von WaldWisconsin Supreme Court · 1964
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.