Legal Opinion

Suburban Ice Manufacturing & Cold Storage Co. v. Mulvihill

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided March 29, 1926PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHamilton, J.

Defendant in error brought suit against the plaintiff in error in the court of common pleas upon a promissory note. The execution and delivery and nonpayment of the amount claimed in the petition is admitted in the answer.

Plaintiff in error, defendant below, by way of cross-petition, claimed damages against plaintiff for breach of his contract in the sale of the assets and the good will of his ice company, for which the note was a part consideration.

The execution and nonpayment of the note being admitted, the case was heard, and evidence introduced, on the cross-petition. At the close of the…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. J. L. Cooper & Co. v. Anchor Securities Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Colton v. DuvallMichigan Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Hirsh v. MillerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1966
  4. Worgess Agency, Inc. v. LaneMichigan Court of Appeals · 1976
  5. Terminal Vegetable Co. v. BeckOhio Court of Appeals · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API