Legal Opinion

Miller v. Sutherland

Montana Supreme Court

Decided April 3, 1957No. 9558PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MR. CHIEF JUSTICE HARRISON:

Respondent brought this action to quiet title to certain de scribed real property. By answer appellant denied tbe allegations of the complaint except that respondent was the owner and in possession of the real estate, and alleged that appellant asserted an inchoate right of dower in the real property because she was the wife of the respondent. In addition, the answer sets up a cross-complaint containing two causes of action; first that the appellant was the common-law wife of the respondent; and second that respondent and appellant had entered into an agreement by…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Sharon v. Sharon, 11991 (Cal. 7-17-1889)California Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Allen v. PetrickMontana Supreme Court · 1924
  3. In Re Estate of BaldwinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
  4. White v. WhiteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  5. Yardley's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1874

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Jim's Water Service v. EayrsWyoming Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Barnett v. HunsakerMontana Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Metropolitan Life Insurance v. JohnsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Miller v. TOWNSEND LUMBER COMPANYMontana Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Williams v. GholsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1961

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API