City of Aurora Ex Rel. Its Utility Enterprise v. Northern Colorado Water Conservancy District
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Opinion of the Court 1
Opinion modified, and as modified, Petition for Rehearing DENIED.
2Opinion of the Court · MullarkeyChief Justice Mullarkey
I. Introduction
Opposers Northern Colorado Water Conservancy District (“Northern Water”) and East Cherry Creek Valley Water and Sanitation District (“ECCV”) appeal a May 6, 2009 decree of the district court, Water Division Number 1 (the “water court”). Northern Water claims that Aurora must discount any water from the Colorado-Big Thompson (“CBT”) Project that might flow through a proposed exchange reach when calculating that reach’s exchange potential. ECCV contends that a 1976 contract with the City of Aurora does not allow the…
3Cases cited7 opinions
- City of Thornton v. Bijou Irrigation Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1996
- USI Properties East, Inc. v. SimpsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1997
- City & County of Denver Ex Rel. Board of Water Commissioners v. Consolidated Ditches Co. of District No. 2Supreme Court of Colorado · 1991
- Bennett Bear Creek Farm Water & Sanitation District v. City & County of Denver Ex Rel. Board of Water CommissionersSupreme Court of Colorado · 1996
- Cherokee Metropolitan District v. SimpsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 2006
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by3 opinions
- Owens v. TergesonColorado Court of Appeals · 2015
- Tep Rocky Mountain Llc, a Delaware Limited Liability Company, F/K/A Wpx Energy Rocky Mountain, Llc, a Delaware Limited Liability Company v. Record Tj Ranch Limited Partnership, a Wyoming Limited PartnershipWyoming Supreme Court · 2022
- Inc. v. MewhinneyColorado Court of Appeals · 2019