Legal Opinion

City of Aurora Ex Rel. Its Utility Enterprise v. Northern Colorado Water Conservancy District

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided August 2, 2010No. 09SA158PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court 1

Opinion modified, and as modified, Petition for Rehearing DENIED.

2Opinion of the Court · MullarkeyChief Justice Mullarkey

I. Introduction

Opposers Northern Colorado Water Conservancy District (“Northern Water”) and East Cherry Creek Valley Water and Sanitation District (“ECCV”) appeal a May 6, 2009 decree of the district court, Water Division Number 1 (the “water court”). Northern Water claims that Aurora must discount any water from the Colorado-Big Thompson (“CBT”) Project that might flow through a proposed exchange reach when calculating that reach’s exchange potential. ECCV contends that a 1976 contract with the City of Aurora does not allow the…

3Cases cited7 opinions

  1. City of Thornton v. Bijou Irrigation Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1996
  2. USI Properties East, Inc. v. SimpsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1997
  3. City & County of Denver Ex Rel. Board of Water Commissioners v. Consolidated Ditches Co. of District No. 2Supreme Court of Colorado · 1991
  4. Bennett Bear Creek Farm Water & Sanitation District v. City & County of Denver Ex Rel. Board of Water CommissionersSupreme Court of Colorado · 1996
  5. Cherokee Metropolitan District v. SimpsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 2006

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by3 opinions

  1. Owens v. TergesonColorado Court of Appeals · 2015
  2. Tep Rocky Mountain Llc, a Delaware Limited Liability Company, F/K/A Wpx Energy Rocky Mountain, Llc, a Delaware Limited Liability Company v. Record Tj Ranch Limited Partnership, a Wyoming Limited PartnershipWyoming Supreme Court · 2022
  3. Inc. v. MewhinneyColorado Court of Appeals · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API