Legal Opinion · Dissent

Tapley v. Peterson

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided February 27, 1986No. 5-85-0122Published

1DissentJustice Welch

I respectfully dissent. I would hold that plaintiffs did not prove their 20-year possession of the disputed triangle by “clear and unequivocal evidence.” Martin v. My Farm, Inc. (1983), 111 Ill. App. 3d 1097, 1103, 445 N.E.2d 44, 48.

The critical question of fact at trial was when the Nowaks began to “possess” the disputed area by beginning construction of their driveway. Mr. James apparent deposition testimony that work on the drive-in theater began in 1963 and that the drive-in theater opened for business on February 7, 1964, is uncontradicted (no transcript of James’ deposition appears of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Joiner v. JanssenIllinois Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Beard v. HennIllinois Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Martin v. My Farm, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API