Legal Opinion

In re Ashley S.

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided May 30, 2013No. 4PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McDonald, j.

A parent has a fundamental right to rear his or her children without unwarranted interference by the State. This liberty interest, protected by the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution,1 occupies “a unique place in our legal culture, given the centrality of family life as the focus for *684personal meaning and responsibility” and is “essential to the orderly pursuit of happiness.”2 But this right is not absolute. It must be balanced against society’s obligation, exercised through the State, to ensure the child’s welfare.3

In this case, two young sisters who had been…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Lassiter v. Department of Social Servs. of Durham Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. Pierce v. Society of SistersSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  3. In Re Yve S.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2003
  4. In Re Adoption/Guardianship No. 10941Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1994
  5. In Re: Adoption/guardianship of Rashawn H.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2007

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. In re Adoption of Jayden G.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2013
  2. In Re: R.S.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2020
  3. Easter v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2015
  4. In re C.E.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2017
  5. In re: T.K.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2022

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API