Legal Opinion
Presnick v. Berger
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided November 5, 1993No. Civ. 3:93-1003 (JAC)PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON CROSS MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
JOSÉ A. CABRANES, Chief Judge:
The plaintiff, an adult, non-senior resident of Orange, Connecticut, has brought this “reverse age discrimination” action against the defendant Dorothy Berger, the First Selectman of the Town of Orange, alleging that the Town’s fee waiver, which permits all residents of the Town of Orange who are sixty years of age and older to use the facilities at the Orange Pool and Fitness Room without charge, violates the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, and 42…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- McGowan v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Griffin v. BreckenridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Massachusetts Board of Retirement v. MurgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Carson v. LewisDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1999
- Residents for Sane Trash Solutions, Inc. v. United States Army Corps of EngineersDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2014
- Presnick v. Town of OrangeDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2001
- De Mejias v. MalloyDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2018
- Presnick v. DelaneyDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1999
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.