Legal Opinion

Reed v. Cantwell

New York Supreme Court

Decided September 22, 1981PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Harold J. Hughes, J.

The defendant moves for an order pursuant to CPLR 3120 (subd [b]) compelling a nonparty witness to produce copies of records which are material and necessary to the defense of this action.

This is an action by the plaintiff to recover for personal injuries sustained in a collision between his motorcycle and an automobile operated by the defendant. On January 19, 1981 the defendant’s attorney served a notice for discovery and inspection demanding that plaintiff provide executed medical authorizations entitling him to inspect *794and copy the office records, X…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hoenig v. WestphalNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
  2. Major Chevrolet, Inc. v. Charles Pisacano, Inc.Civil Court of the City of New York · 1968

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Tower v. Chemical BankAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
  2. Przekop v. Lo GalboNew York Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Sears v. RekucNew York Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Frasier v. ConklinNew York Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Pagan v. St. John's Preparatory SchoolNew York Supreme Court · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API