Clark v. Dalziel
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco and from an order denying a new trial. M. C. Sloss, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtCooper, J.
This action was tried with a jury, and a verdict returned for plaintiff, upon which judgment was entered. Defendant appeals from the judgment and an order denying his motion for a new trial. No' question is raised as to the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the verdict, nor is any instruction to the jury challenged. The action was brought to recover commissions on the sale of real estate.
On the nineteenth day of August, 1902, the defendant, by an instrument in writing, employed the plaintiff, as his sole and exclusive agent, to sell certain real estate described in the instrument, being…
2Cited by7 opinions
- People v. KynetteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
- Novakovich v. Union Trust Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1909
- People v. NeelyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
- Edwards v. LairdCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1913
- People v. NoblesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.