Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Salomon Ledezma-Cosino v. Jefferson Sessions

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 30, 2017No. 12-73289Published

1ConcurrenceWatford, Circuit Judge

We took this case en banc to decide whether the Immigration and Nationality Act’s “habitual drunkard” provision, 8 U.S.C. § 1101(f)(1), is facially unconstitutional on the theory that it violates the equal protection component of the Fifth Amendment’s Due Process Clause. I think the majority rightly rejects that challenge, but my reasons for reaching that conclusion differ.

The statutory classification at issue does not implicate a fundamental right or target a suspect class, so it is subject to rational basis review. FCC v. Beach Communications, Inc., 508 U.S. 307, 313, 113 S.Ct. 2096, 124…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Federal Communications Commission v. Beach Communications, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Fiallo Ex Rel. Rodriguez v. BellSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Weinberger v. SalfiSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. Massachusetts Board of Retirement v. MurgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API