Legal Opinion

City of Richmond v. Courtney

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided January 15, 1880PublishedCited by 7 opinions

This was a writ of error to a judgment of the circuit court of the city of Richmond, in an action on the case brought by Elizabeth Courtney against the city of Richmond, to recover damages for an injury sustained by her, by reason of a defect in one of the sidewalks of the city. There was a verdict and judgment for the plaintiff for $1,500: and the city obtained a writ of error. The cáse is fully stated by Judge Christian in his opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtChristian, J.

This is a writ of error to a judgment of the circuit court of the city of Richmond.

*The suit was an action of trespass on the case, brought by the plaintiff, Elizabeth Courtney, against the city of Richmond, to recover damages for injuries received by her in consequence of a fall on *266one of the streets of said city, produced by an alleged defect on the sidewalk caused by the negligence of the defendant. In the court below the defendant demurred to the plaintiff’s evidence, and the jury found a verdict subject to the demurrer for the plaintiff and assessed her damages at the sum of $1,500.

And…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Town of Gosport v. EvansIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Moore v. City of RichmondSupreme Court of Virginia · 1888
  3. Newport News & Old Point Railway & Electric Co. v. BradfordSupreme Court of Virginia · 1902
  4. Bedford City v. SitwellSupreme Court of Virginia · 1909
  5. Town of Danville v. PaceSupreme Court of Virginia · 1874

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API