Legal Opinion

United States v. One 1962 Mercury Sedan

District Court, N.D. Mississippi

Decided June 8, 1963No. Nos. G-C-20-62, G-C-25-62PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

CLAYTON, District Judge.

These two automobile forfeiture cases were tried concurrently with a companion criminal case, which was tried to a jury. Forfeiture of the cargo of one of the automobiles is also involved in these proceedings. Such additional evidence as bore on the forfeiture cases was heard by the court out of the presence of the jury. These cases are now for disposition on the 'facts thus developed and memorandum briefs of the parties.

The jury found all defendants guilty as charged in said companion *141criminal case, and it is probable that they found the facts to be as this court now…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Kent v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1946
  2. United States v. One 1952 Lincoln Sedan, Motor No. 52lp22535h (Merchants Nat. Bank of Mobile, Intervenor)Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1954
  3. Oliver v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1948
  4. United States v. Fifty-two CasesDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1945
  5. United States v. One 1959 Pontiac Tudor Sedan Motor No. B271200, Serial No. 859a5856, Eddie LaneCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1962

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States v. One 1968 Ford Pickup Truck, Motor No. F10BKD33254District Court, S.D. Alabama · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API