Hale v. Hale
South Dakota Supreme Court
Appeal from circuit court, Meade county. Hon. Joseph B. Moore, Judge. Acton by John D. Hale against. James A. Hale. From a judgment in favor of plaintiff, defendant appeals. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtFuller, P. J.
After the preliminary averment that the parties litigant had jointly purchased horses and sold them to the United States for the use of its cavalry, pursuant to an agreement to -hare equally in all profits and losses, the ultimate facts upon which plaintiff obtained a judgment from which the defendant appeals, are stated thus: “That thereafter, and on or about the 13th day of December, A. D. 1898, the plaintiff and defendant had a settlement, and defendant made and rendered plaintiff an account stated of the balance of net profits due plaintiff on account of the sale of said cavalry horses to…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Wiggins v. BurkhamSupreme Court of the United States · 1870
- Wahl v. . BarnumNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
- Schutz v. . MoretteNew York Court of Appeals · 1895
- Heinrich v. EnglundSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1885
- Bouslog v. GarrettIndiana Supreme Court · 1872
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.