Legal Opinion

In re J. H. Small Shoe Co.

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided December 6, 1926No. 100PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHand, Circuit Judge

(after stating the facts as'above). Assuming, though not deciding, that we may not look to the opinion as a summary of the evidence taken before the District Court, we have nothing before us except the petition, the answer, and the order. *206The sole question is whether, on these, some error of law appears.

We think that there does. The answer alleges in prassenti that the respondent does, “to the extent of his means, offer an adjustment of the trustee’s claim,-but the trustee has refused to accept said offer.” The record being bare of anything but the pleadings, we are to decide whether the sum…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In re StavrahnCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1909
  2. In re Weber Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1912

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. In Re OrielCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1928
  2. Shulman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1927
  3. In Re AbesbaumCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1934
  4. In re WaltDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1927
  5. In re Ahlstrom & Enholm Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1928

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API