Legal Opinion
United States v. William Randall Newbern, Robert Bryan Sheppard
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Decided May 3, 1984No. 83-7145PublishedCited by 59 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HATCHETT, Circuit Judge:
In this criminal case, we examine first, whether the district court erred when it denied the appellants’ motions to suppress evidence seized in their motel room; second, whether sufficient evidence existed to support the jury’s verdicts of guilty; and third, whether appellants are entitled to a new trial due to comments made by the prosecutor in his closing argument. Find-' ing that the trial court committed no reversible error, and that sufficient evidence exists to support the jury’s verdict, we affirm.
Background
In February, 1982, agents of the Alabama Bureau of…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Berger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Smith v. PhillipsSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- United States v. Laurel Joan MorrisCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by59 opinions
- United States v. Ronald Tobin, Clifford Roger Ackerson, United States of America v. Ronald TobinCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1991
- Douglas McClish v. Richard B. NugentCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2007
- United States v. RosenthalCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1986
- E.J. Wilson, Dearest Davis, and Cassandra Linder, Plaintiffs v. Roland AttawayCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985
- United States v. Garcia-RosaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989
54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.