Legal Opinion
Bryan v. Paramount Packaging Corp.
Tennessee Supreme Court
Decided October 1, 1984PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BROCK, Justice.
In this worker’s compensation case the trial court denied benefits on the ground that the plaintiff’s injury was due to his willful misconduct; recovery was barred under the provisions of T.C.A., § 50-6-110, which provides:
“(a) No compensation shall be allowed for an injury or a death due to the em*454ployee’s willful misconduct or intentional self-inflicted injury, or due to intoxication, or willful failure or refusal to use a safety appliance or perform a duty required by law.
“(b) If the employer defends on the ground that the injury arose in any or all of the above stated…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Rayner v. Sligh Furniture Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1914
- Coleman v. CokerTennessee Supreme Court · 1959
- Wright v. Gunther Nash Mining Construction Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1981
- Glass v. SullivanTennessee Supreme Court · 1936
- American Mut. Liability Ins. v. GarthTennessee Supreme Court · 1939
3Cited by8 opinions
- Troy Mitchell v. Fayetteville Public UtilitiesTennessee Supreme Court · 2012
- Anderson v. Westfield GroupTennessee Supreme Court · 2008
- Nance v. State Industries, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2000
- Wolfe v. MBNA America BankDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2007
- Loy v. North Bros. Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1990
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.