Legal Opinion

Provident Trust Co. v. Hofstetter

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Delaware County

Decided July 22, 1938No. 808Published

1Opinion of the Court

Broomall, J.,

Motions of plaintiff for judgment non obstante veredicto and for a new trial were *604argued before the court in banc. As the motion for a new trial was not pressed at the argument or referred to in the briefs filed, we assume it is abandoned. No substantial reasons were assigned for a new trial.

The same question now before us was considered on a motion of plaintiff for judgment for want of a sufficient affidavit of defense. We were then of the opinion that it should be submitted to a jury in order to have all the facts fully developed. However, upon the trial the facts were…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Kitchen's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1861
  2. Call v. WardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1842
  3. Colucci's EstateSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API