Provident Trust Co. v. Hofstetter
Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Delaware County
1Opinion of the Court
Broomall, J.,
Motions of plaintiff for judgment non obstante veredicto and for a new trial were *604argued before the court in banc. As the motion for a new trial was not pressed at the argument or referred to in the briefs filed, we assume it is abandoned. No substantial reasons were assigned for a new trial.
The same question now before us was considered on a motion of plaintiff for judgment for want of a sufficient affidavit of defense. We were then of the opinion that it should be submitted to a jury in order to have all the facts fully developed. However, upon the trial the facts were…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Kitchen's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1861
- Call v. WardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1842
- Colucci's EstateSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1924