Legal Opinion

Bott v. Lakowsky

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided June 30, 1923No. 26023PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSt. Paul, J.

The relator obtained a permit from the city of New Orleans to erect a drug store ou State street; but when the work was begun the city withdrew said permit and stopped the work through its police force, as being done in violation of an ordinance prohibiting business establishments on said street. Article 5793, O. C. S.

Whereupon relator applied to one of the judges of the civil district court, and obtained an injunction forbidding said city from interfering with relator in the construction of said building, on the ground that said ordinance did not prohibit drug stores, and in the alternative…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. O'Connell v. Chicago Terminal Transfer RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1900
  2. Elson v. ComstockIllinois Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Aurianne v. City of New OrleansSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1913

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Town of Winnsboro v. PriceSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1928
  2. Irwin v. Lutece Baby & Novelty Shop, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1924
  3. Sica v. City of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API