Legal Opinion
Moran Towing & Transportation Co. v. United States
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided March 27, 1944PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BRIGHT, District Judge.
On or about September 25, 1942, libellant was requested by the respondent to assist the latter’s steamship Philip Schuyler, from Pier 9 West Shore, New Jersey, to Pier 14, Hoboken, New Jersey, the vessel to use her own propelling power, under an agreement which provided, among other things, that when the captain of any tug furnished by libellant or engaged in such assistance, or any other licensed pilot, goes on board the vessel, it would be understood that such captain or pilot became the servant of the owner of the vessel, assisted in respect to the giving of orders…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Matson Navigation Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Sun Oil Co. v. Dalzell Towing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Moran Towing & Transportation Co. v. Navigazione Libera Triestina, S. A.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1937
- The LassellDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1912
- Australia Transit Co. v. Lehigh Valley Transp. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1916
3Cited by14 opinions
- A/s J. Ludwig Mowinckles Rederi v. Tidewater Construction Corporation, Lone Star Industries, Inc. v. Gearbulk, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1977
- Oxford Shipping Co., Ltd. v. New Hampshire Trading Corp., Oxford Shipping Co., Ltd. v. New Hampshire Trading Corp., Avon Trading Corp.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1983
- Greenwich Marine, Inc. v. S.S. AlexandraCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1965
- Greenwich Marine, Incorporated v. SS AlexandraDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1964
- Atlantic Carriers, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1955
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.