Legal Opinion

Smith v. Barnett

District Court, W.D. New York

Decided March 21, 1917No. 195-BPublishedCited by 1 opinion

In Equity. Suit by Frank Sullivan Smith, as receiver of the Pitts-burg, Shawmut & Northern Railroad Company and the mortgaged properties of the Shawmut Mining Company and the Kersey Mining Company, against james R. Barnett and others. On motion to remand.

1Opinion of the Court

HAZEE, District Judge.

This action in equity was begun in the Supreme Court of New York to enjoin the defendants from carrying out or continuing a conspiracy to injure the Pittsburg, Shawmut & Northern Railroad Company (hereinafter called the Northern Company) in its transportation business by diverting traffic therefrom and by wrongfully lowering the value of its securities, thus causing irremediable *84damage. The defendant corporations are citizens of Pennsylvania, while the individual defendants are citizens and residents of this state. The action was removed to this court, and the plaintiff…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Alabama Great Southern Railway Co. v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
  2. Wecker v. National Enameling & Stamping Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1907
  3. Arkansas v. Kansas & Texas Coal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1901
  4. In Re WinnSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
  5. Geer v. Mathieson Alkali WorksSupreme Court of the United States · 1903

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Wallace v. Motor Products CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API