Legal Opinion

Hamilton v. Thomson

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided April 1, 1896No. 64PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Memorandum. — Error from Shawnee district court; Z. T. Hazen, judge. Action by W. C. Hamilton and another against William Thomson and another to set aside a .judgment. Judgment for defendants. Plaintiffs bring the case to this court.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Clark, J.:

The record in this case shows that on August 14, 1893, ‘William Thomson and R. C. Heizer, partners as Thomson & Heizer, commenced an action in justice’s court against W. C. Plamilton and S. E. Hamilton before one William R. Hazen, a justice of the peace of the city of Topeka, Shawnee county, and that, on September 17, following, the said Hazen, upon a trial of said action, rendered a judgment in favor of the plaintiffs and against the defendants in the sum of $154.56, together with the costs, taxed at $4.05; that several executions were…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Frazier v. CrowellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1877
  2. Bigelow v. BoothMichigan Supreme Court · 1878
  3. Ex parte Butler v. Lewis C. P.New York Supreme Court · 1833
  4. Allen v. CorlewSupreme Court of Kansas · 1872
  5. Street v. McClerkinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1884

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. True v. MendenhallSupreme Court of Kansas · 1903

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API