Legal Opinion · Concurrence

R. H. Macey & Co. v. Chancey

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided September 27, 1967No. 42712Published

1ConcurrenceEberhaedt, Judge

I concur in the judg-

ment of reversal, and offer some additional reasons why I deem it to be correct. To authorize the setting aside of a judgment (unless it be absolutely void) the motion must show that the defendant had a meritorious defense and that failure to interpose it at the proper time resulted from excusable neglect.

“The motion must show that he has a good and meritorious defense to the action, not merely by so alleging, but by setting forth fully the facts which constitute the proposed defense, except in cases where the judgment is absolutely void, when no defense need be shown.”…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Moore v. Kelly & Jones Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1900
  2. Phillips v. TaberSupreme Court of Georgia · 1889
  3. Blanch v. KingSupreme Court of Georgia · 1947
  4. Chance v. ChanceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1939
  5. Pryor v. American Trust & Banking Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1915

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API