Kennedy v. City of Hood River
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtCoshow, J.
Defendants contend that by virtue of the exception in the deed from the defendant city to Batchelder, the city was the absolute owner of the building and fixtures therein. The plaintiff contends that he is a purchaser without notice, and that the exception and reservation in the deed do not prevent the building and fixtures from passing to him as a part of the realty. Plaintiff also contends that the exception and reservation operated to retain ownership of said building and fixtures in defendant city only conditionally; said ownership depending upon the same being removed on* or before July…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Tifft v. . HortonNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
- Blake-McFall Co. v. WilsonOregon Supreme Court · 1920
- First State & Savings Bank v. OliverOregon Supreme Court · 1921
- Sowden & Co. v. CraigSupreme Court of Iowa · 1868
- Deckenbach v. DeckenbachOregon Supreme Court · 1913
3Cited by7 opinions
- Russell v. Golden Rule Mining Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1945
- Mattechek v. PughOregon Supreme Court · 1935
- Rall Et Ux. v. Purcell Et Ux.Oregon Supreme Court · 1929
- Esbjornsson v. Buffalo Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
- Lilenquist v. Pitchford's, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1974
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.