Legal Opinion

Smith Barney, Harris Upham & Co. v. Citibank

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 5, 1990PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order of the Supreme Court, New York County (Francis Pecora, J.), entered on or about August 1, 1989, which inter alia, denied plaintiff-appellant’s motion for summary judgment, (i) awarding it judgment on its first cause of action; (ii) dismissing defendant-respondent Citibank’s affirmative defenses; and (iii) dismissing the cross claims of the third-party defendants, unanimously reversed, to the extent appealed from, on the law, and the plaintiff’s motion granted, in its entirety, with costs.

Under the circumstances of this case, plaintiff-appellant Smith Barney, as drawer, has a clear…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Arrow Builders Supply Corp. v. Royal National Bank of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1968
  2. Kosic v. Marine Midland BankAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
  3. Kosic v. Marine Midland BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1981

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Knight Publishing Co. v. Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1997
  2. Morrow v. Apple Bank for SavingsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  3. Seaboard Surety Co. v. Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API