New York Susquehanna & Western Railway Corp. v. State
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
1Per curiam
We affirm the judgment substantially for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Judge Lasser reported at 6 N.J.Tax 575 (Tax Ct.1984).
Plaintiff’s challenge to the judgment is principally founded upon its contention that “the Tax Court erred in its ruling that the court did not have jurisdiction to hear an appeal from a final decision of the Division of Taxation.” Our reading of Judge Lasser’s opinion, however, satisfies us that he made no such ruling; we therefore do not determine whether the Tax Court does or does not have jurisdiction to entertain such an appeal.
We also do not address…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- New York Susquehanna v. State Department of TreasuryNew Jersey Tax Court · 1984
- Exxon Corp. v. Tp. of East BrunswickNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1983
3Cited by11 opinions
- DEUTSCHE BANK NAT. v. MitchellNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2011
- Greenfield v. NJ Dept. of Corr.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2006
- Betancourt v. Trinitas Hosp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2010
- State of New Jersey v. Cecilio DavilaNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2016
- In the Matter of Registrant J.S.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2016
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.