Legal Opinion

Haeg v. City of Pocatello

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided April 19, 1977No. 11941PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BISTLINE, Justice.

Plaintiff, Leo V. Haeg, a diabetic, went into insulin shock while operating his car, became unconscious, and was then arrested by City of Pocatello (City) police officers. Haeg’s action against the City is premised on a claim of false arrest, assault and battery, and City’s negligence in hiring the police officer who allegedly committed the tortious acts. Alleging no special damages, he seeks substantial general damages. On City’s motion, the action was dismissed. City’s motion was based on the “exceptions” provision of the Idaho Tort Claim Act (ITCA) of 1971, applicable…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Smith v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Brown v. Wichita State UniversitySupreme Court of Kansas · 1976
  3. Newlan v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Davis v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 1917
  5. Hollister v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 1903

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Leliefeld v. JohnsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Harris v. State, Dept. of HealthIdaho Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Tracy Tucker v. State of IdahoIdaho Supreme Court · 2017
  4. Osmunson v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Gordon v. NobleIdaho Court of Appeals · 1986

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API