Gordy v. Powell
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtCarlisle, J.
Headnote 1 is self-explanatory and requires no elaboration.
As there was a sharp conflict in the evidence as to the material facts together with all reasonable deductions and inferences to be drawn therefrom, a verdict was authorized but not demanded for either party, and the trial court, consequently, did not err in denying the defendants’ motion for a directed verdict, their motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict, nor the general grounds of their motion for a new trial. Shaw v. Probasco, 139 Ga. 481 (1) (77 S. E. 577); Snyder v. Elkan, 187 Ga. 164 (1) (199 S. E. 891).
In special…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Brown v. Georgia-Tennessee Coaches, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1953
- Savannah, Florida & Western Railway v. StewartSupreme Court of Georgia · 1884
- Tompkins v. American Land Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1913
- Rogers v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1916
- Western & Atlantic Railroad v. BusseySupreme Court of Georgia · 1894
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Dini v. NaiditchIllinois Supreme Court · 1960
- Duffy v. Lipsman-Fulkerson & Co.District Court, D. Montana · 1961
- Durrett v. FarrarCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1973
- Karczewski v. Baltimore and Ohio Railroad CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1967
- Mitchell v. GayCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1965
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.