Karlberg European Tanspa, Inc. v. JK-Josef Kratz Vertriebsgesellschaft mbH
District Court, N.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
MORAN, District Judge.
This case involves a contract dispute between Karlberg European Tanspa, Inc. (KETS), an American company in the business of selling tanning salon franchises and equipment, and JK-Josef Kratz Vertriebsgesellschaft mbH (JK), a German company which manufactures and sold KETS sun-tanning equipment. JK has moved to dismiss the action for improper venue under Rule 12(b)(3) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. 1 For the following reasons, the court grants defendant’s motion.
I
The relationship between KETS and JK started in 1982, when JK approached Ann and…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- The Bremen v. Zapata Off-Shore Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Coastal Steel Corp. v. Tilghman Wheelabrator Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1983
- Eleanor Snyder, of the Estate of Leroy Liljedahl v. Bruton SmithCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
- In Re Oil Spill by Amoco Cadiz Off Coast of France March 16Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1981
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Riley v. Kingsley Underwriting Agencies, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
- Heller Financial, Inc. v. Midwhey Powder Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
- Ronar, Inc. v. WallaceDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1986
- Riley v. Kingsley Underwriting Agencies, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1992
- Commerce Consultants International, Inc. v. Vetrerie Riunite, S.P.A.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1989
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.