Lindauer Bros. v. Hay
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Black Hawk Circuit Court. Action of replevin to recover specific goods and merchandise. Upon a verdict for plaintiff, a judgment was rendered,. and defendants appeal. The facts of the case appear in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtBeck, J.
— I. The petition of plaintiffs is in two counts. The first alleges that, on the 27th day of July, 1881, defendant Hay, being in the business of selling clothing at Waterloo, ordered the goods replived, which belong to that line of trade, from plaintiffs who were doing business at Chicago. On the 29th of the same month, the order was accepted and filled, and the goods were shipped, and were received by Hay at Waterloo on the 5th of the following month. Before accepting the order, plaintiffs sought information of Hay’s financial responsibility from a commercial agency, to whom .Hay had made a…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Oswego Starch Factory v. LendrumSupreme Court of Iowa · 1881
3Cited by11 opinions
- M. W. O'rieley, Trustee in Bankruptcy of Woerderhoff Shoe Co., Inc. v. Endicott-Johnson CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1961
- P. Cox Shoe Co. v. AdamsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1898
- Danner v. CooperSupreme Court of Iowa · 1932
- Reid, Murdock & Fisher v. CowduroySupreme Court of Iowa · 1890
- Chilson v. HoustonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1900
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.