Dannie Mael v. Lydia McEvoy

Dannie Mael appeals the circuit court’s dismissal with prejudice of her pro se petition for writ of quo warranto. Because of the woeful inadequacies of Mael’s brief, which prevent us from determining what her complaint is, we dismiss Mael’s appeal.

An appellant is required to substantially comply with this Court’s briefing requirements enumerated in Rule 84.04. Thompson v. Flagstar Bank, FSB, 299 S.W.3d 311, 318 (Mo.App.2009). Failure to comply with these requirements constitutes grounds for dismissal. First State Bank of St. Charles v. Am. Family Mut. Ins. Co., 277 S.W.3d 749, 752…