Cary v. Allstate Insurance
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.
— Petitioner Aloha Cary sought review of a *337decision by the Court of Appeals, Division Two, affirming a grant of summary judgment by the Clark County Superior Court in favor of Respondent Allstate Insurance Company dismissing her claim against Allstate for coverage under a homeowner’s policy for a criminal act committed by a homeowner while insane. We granted review. We affirm.
QUESTION PRESENTED
The question presented in this case is whether an exclusion clause in a homeowners’ insurance policy denying coverage for acts committed by an insured while insane violates public policy and thus should…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Olympic Steamship Co., Inc. v. Centennial Ins. Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1991
- State Farm General Insurance v. EmersonWashington Supreme Court · 1984
- Mutual of Enumclaw Insurance v. WiscombWashington Supreme Court · 1982
- Brown v. Snohomish County Physicians Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1993
- Mahoney v. ShinpochWashington Supreme Court · 1987
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Allstate Ins. Co. v. PeasleyWashington Supreme Court · 1997
- Allstate Insurance v. PeasleyWashington Supreme Court · 1997
- State Ex Rel. Quick-Ruben v. VerharenWashington Supreme Court · 1998
- Allstate Insurance v. RaynorWashington Supreme Court · 2001
- Allstate Ins. Co. v. RaynorWashington Supreme Court · 2001
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.