Legal Opinion
Hood v. Whitwell
New York Supreme Court
Decided January 15, 1910PublishedCited by 5 opinions
Action for an injunction. Case submitted on an agreed statement of facts.
1Opinion of the CourtPound, J.
On or about May 5, 1908, the State of Hew York, under the provisions of the Barge Canal Act, acquired title to and took possession of Mrs. Hood’s land and store building in the village of Knowlesville for canal purposes. On March 18, 1908, the State entered into a contract with *50the Orimmins Company, for the construction of a section of the Barge canal between the Eagle Harbor bridge and Beal’s bridge. Mrs. Hood’s building was on the site of said contract, and the contractor took possession thereof from the State. On July 27, 1909\ the contractor sold or attempted to sell the Hood building to…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- People, Ex Rel. Muller v. . B'd of AssessorsNew York Court of Appeals · 1883
- Schuchardt v. . Mayor, Etc., of N.Y.New York Court of Appeals · 1873
3Cited by5 opinions
- Melton v. . Fullerton-Weaver Realty Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1915
- Bank of Bullochville v. RiehleCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1927
- Maffetone v. MicariCity of New York Municipal Court · 1954
- Eichhammer v. ParsonsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1936
- William Grossman v. BeckNew York Supreme Court · 1959