Holloway v. Woods
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Duckworth, Justice.
“When land is bounded in a deed by the land of an adjacent owner, there can be no prescription under the deed, as against such owner, further than the actual possession of the grantee in the deed extends.” Strong v. Powell, 92 Ga. 591 (20 S. E. 6). To the same effect, see Quarterman v. Perry, 190 Ga. 275 (3) (9 S. E. 2d, 61); Anderson v. Black, 191 Ga. 627 (2) (13 S. E. 2d, 650); Robertson v. Abernathy, 192 Ga. 694 (16 S. E. 2d, 584). It is declared in the Code, § 85-404: '“Adjacent owners may be in constructive possession of the same land, being included in the boundaries…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Robertson v. AbernathySupreme Court of Georgia · 1941
- Tillman v. BomarSupreme Court of Georgia · 1910
- Sweeney v. SweeneySupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
- Paxson v. BaileySupreme Court of Georgia · 1855
- Quarterman v. PerrySupreme Court of Georgia · 1940
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- DOUBLE" D" BAR" C" RANCH v. BellSupreme Court of Georgia · 2008
- Tapley v. ClaxtonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1942
- Moore v. StephensSupreme Court of Georgia · 1945
- Tapley v. ClaxtonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1942