Legal Opinion

King v. King

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided November 16, 1993No. 62095PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GRIMM, Judge.

Father appeals from a modification order which increased the amount he is to pay for child support. We affirm.

I. Jurisdiction

Before considering the merits, we address mother’s challenge to our jurisdiction. She contends father did not file a timely notice of appeal; therefore, this court lacks jurisdiction to consider his appeal. We disagree.

In August, 1990, mother moved to modify her dissolution decree. On August 21, 1991, an evidentiary hearing was held. The August 21 docket sheet entry states, “The court indicates to counsel its findings and conclusions and directfs] counsel…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In Re Marriage of McCoyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1991
  2. Grantham v. Shelter Mutual Insurance Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1986
  3. Switzer v. SwitzerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1992
  4. Sprague-Cappel ex rel. Cappel v. SpragueMissouri Court of Appeals · 1993
  5. Mudd v. MuddMissouri Court of Appeals · 1993

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. In Re Marriage of TrimbleMissouri Court of Appeals · 1998
  2. Hihn v. HihnMissouri Court of Appeals · 2007
  3. Marriage of Wagner v. WagnerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1995
  4. Carol v. McKinneyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1994
  5. Anderson v. AndersonMissouri Court of Appeals · 2001

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API