Legal Opinion · Dissent

R. Olsen Oil Co. v. Fidler. Fidler v. R. Olsen Oil Co

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided October 29, 1952No. 4467, 4468Published

1Dissent

PHILLIPS, Chief Judge.(dissenting in part).

It is my opinion that, under the facts presented, the trial court’s instruction on the measure of damages was erroneous. In all other respects, I concur in the opinion of the court.

R. Olsen Oil Company, hereinafter called1 Olsen, entered into a written contract with Fidler under which, in consideration of the assignment of oil and gas leases covering approximately 6,000 acres of land in Torrance County, New Mexico, by Fidler to Olsen, Olsen agreed to drill an oil and gas well, at a stipulated location on the area embraced in such leases, to a depth…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Richardson v. HardwickSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  2. Daughetee v. Ohio Oil Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Phenix Ins. v. KerrCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1904
  4. Hoffer Oil Corporation v. CarpenterCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1929
  5. Milwaukee Mechanics' Ins. v. B. S. Rhea & SonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1903

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API