Legal Opinion

H.U. Young, Inc. v. Duke Advertising Agency, Inc.

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided November 14, 1985No. CA 3296PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILLIAMS, Judge.

This is an appeal from a judgment of the trial court finding defendant Duke Advertising Agency, Inc. [“Duke”] liable to plaintiff H.U. Young, Inc. [“Young”] for $8,336.72 for breach of contract and on open account as well as interest, costs, and $1,000.00 in attorney’s fees.

Duke is an advertising agency which represented Fermin-Smith Services, a corporate client. Duke asserted that it was on behalf of its principal, Fermin-Smith, that it contracted with plaintiff for printing. Furthermore, Duke argues that plaintiff was aware that it [Duke] was acting as an agent, and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ward v. PenningtonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1983
  2. JT Doiron, Inc. v. LundinLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1980
  3. Roll-Up Shutters, Inc. v. South Cent. Bell Tel. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1981
  4. Castille v. FolckLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1976
  5. Bio-Chem Medical Laboratories, Inc. v. HarveyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1975

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Talley v. MasTec, Inc.District Court, M.D. Louisiana · 2024
  2. Tri-Star Business Forms & Printing, Inc. v. Advertising Group, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1992
  3. Turk v. Fame Modeling & Talent Agency, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API