Legal Opinion

Estate of McMahon

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 3, 1890No. 113PublishedCited by 7 opinions

APPEAL BY JOHN MCMAHON FROM THE ORPHANS’ COURT OF PHILADELPHIA COUNTY. No. 113 July Term 1889, Sup. Ct.; court below, No. 22 March Term 1889, O. C. On Mareb 8, 1889, the second account of John McMahon and Francis Aikens, executors of the will of Bridget McMahon, deceased, was called for audit, before Ashman, J. It was made to appear before the auditing judge that the testator died January 16, 1886, leaving a will dated September 12, 1885, duly admitted to probate, providing…

Read the full summary

APPEAL BY JOHN MCMAHON FROM THE ORPHANS’ COURT OF PHILADELPHIA COUNTY. No. 113 July Term 1889, Sup. Ct.; court below, No. 22 March Term 1889, O. C. On Mareb 8, 1889, the second account of John McMahon and Francis Aikens, executors of the will of Bridget McMahon, deceased, was called for audit, before Ashman, J. It was made to appear before the auditing judge that the testator died January 16, 1886, leaving a will dated September 12, 1885, duly admitted to probate, providing as follows : Item: I hereby direct my executors, hereinafter named, to pay to my daughter, Catharine Aikens, the…

1Per curiam

The well considered opinion of the auditing judge relieves us from a discussion of this case.

Decree affirmed and the appeal dismissed at the costs of the appellant.

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. American Trust & Banking Co. v. BalfourTennessee Supreme Court · 1917
  2. Torchiana's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
  3. Stucker v. ShumakerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  4. Moore v. GilbertSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
  5. Forsyth's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API