Legal Opinion

In re Charlier's Will

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 12, 1897PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from surrogate’s court. In the matter of proving the last will and testament of Elie Charlier, the children of the deceased appeal. Affirmed. Argued before VAN BRUNT, P. J., and WILLIAMS, PATTERSON, O’BRIEN, and INGRAHAM, JJ.'

1Opinion of the CourtIngraham, J.

The only question raised by this appeal is as to the construction to be given to the will of Elie Charlier, deceased. By the third clause of the will the testator gives to his executors all of the residue of his estate in trust, to hold, invest, and keep the same invested, and to dispose of the income as follows: First. The testator gave to Euphemia Marie Douglass Carmichael an annuity of $600 during her life; second, he gave to his daughter-in-law an annuity of $600, which should cease on the death of his wife; and, third, he gave to "his wife the income of all his property, after deducting…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Cochrane v. . SchellNew York Court of Appeals · 1894
  2. Vanderpoel v. . LoewNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
  3. Buchanan v. . LittleNew York Court of Appeals · 1897
  4. Buchanan v. LittleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Dunham v. DeraismesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898
  2. Estate of Langdon, Superior Court of California, County of San Francisco1899

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API