Legal Opinion · Dissent

In re the Arbitration between New Hampshire Insurance & Bobak

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 30, 2010No. Appeal No. 1Published

1Dissent

Martoche, J.P., and Green, J. (dissenting).

We respectfully dissent. As noted by the majority, we concluded on a prior appeal *1651in this case with respect to the first petition seeking to stay the arbitration in question that the “ ‘[arbitration should be stayed, not permanently, but pending the determination of the issue [s] of insurance coverage’ ” in a declaratory judgment action commenced in Pennsylvania by New Hampshire Insurance Company (NHIC), the petitioner in appeal No. 1 and a respondent in appeal No. 2 (Matter of AIG Claims Servs., Inc., v Bobak, 39 AD3d 1178, 1179 [2007]). At the time…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. AIG Claims Services, Inc. v. BobakAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  2. In re the Arbitration between Buffalo Professional Firefighters Ass'n, Local 282 & City of BuffaloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  3. 660 Riverside Drive Aldo Associates L. L. C. v. MarteCivil Court of the City of New York · 1998
  4. In re the Arbitration Between Connecticut Indemnity Insurance & LaperlaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API