Accelerated Benefits Corp. v. Peaslee
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RATLIFEFE, Senior Judge.
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
Defendants-Appellants Senior Benefits and Planning Services, Inc. (SBPS), Jeffrey Collier (Collier), and Robin Collier (collectively "Appellants") appeal the trial court's entry of summary judgment in favor of Plaintiff-Appellee Marshall Peaslee.
We affirm.
ISSUE
Appellants present three issues for our review which we consolidate into one dis-positive issue: whether the trial court erred in entering summary judgment in favor of Peaslee.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
Collier is the president of SBPS. Collier and Peaslee met at a seminar put on by…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Securities and Exchange Commission v. W. J. Howey Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Scott v. Bodor, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1991
- Securities and Exchange Commission v. Life Partners, Incorporated and Brian D. PardoCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996
- Siporin v. CarringtonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2001
- Guardianship Estate of Pflanz v. DavisIndiana Court of Appeals · 1997
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Pike County Highway v. FowlerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1979
- Metropolitan Board of Zoning Appeals of Marion County v. McDonald's Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1985