Legal Opinion
Grievance Administrator v. Fieger
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided December 21, 2006No. 127547Published
1Opinion of the Court
729 N.W.2d 451 (2006)
477 Mich. 1228
GRIEVANCE ADMINISTRATOR, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
Geoffrey N. FIEGER, Respondent-Appellee.
Docket No. 127547.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
December 21, 2006.
On order of the Court, the respondent-appellee's motion for a stay of proceedings is DENIED.
This Court previously determined in this case that the First Amendment of the United States Constitution does not bar the application of the Michigan Rules of Professional Conduct to statements made by respondent-attorney Geoffrey Fieger in the course of a pending lawsuit in the Court of Appeals. Specifically, Mr. Fieger…
Also in this document: Concurrence; Dissent · Cavanagh; Dissent · Weaver.
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Pickering v. Board of Ed. of Township High School Dist. 205, Will Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Tumey v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Republican Party of Minnesota v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Johnson v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- City of Grosse Pointe Park v. Michigan Municipal Liability & Property PoolMichigan Supreme Court · 2005
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.