Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Cottage Savings Assn. v. Commissioner

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided April 17, 1991No. 89-1965Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Justice Blackmun,

with whom Justice White joins, concurring in part and dissenting in part in No. 89-1926, post, p. 573, and dissenting in No. 89-1965.

I agree that the early withdrawal penalties collected by Centennial Savings Bank FSB do not constitute “income by reason of the discharge ... of indebtedness of the taxpayer,” within the meaning of 26 U. S. C. § 108(a)(1) (1982 ed.), and that the penalty amounts are not excludable from Centennial's gross income. I therefore join Part III of the Court’s opinion in No. 89-1926.

*569I dissent, however, from the Court’s conclusions in these two cases…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Basic Inc. v. LevinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. Gregory v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  3. TSC Industries, Inc. v. Northway, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Commissioner v. Court Holding Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
  5. Kungys v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API