Frank v. Frank
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the CourtHammond, C. J.
If the power of testamentary appointment given by the will of Henry S. Frank to his wife Ruth authorized her to appoint to her estate so as to come within the marital deduction provisions of the federal estate tax laws, the federal government will not receive some seventy-five thousand dollars in additional estate taxes it claims to be due; if it did not authorize appointment to her estate, the estate will be that much poorer and the government that much richer.
The widow filed a bill against those who would take in the absence of appointment for a declaration as to the' nature and scope of…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- United States v. FieldSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
- United States v. FieldSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
- Prince De Bearn v. WinansCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1909
- Balls v. DampmanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1888
- Pope v. Safe Deposit & Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1932
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Vito v. GrueffCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2017
- Emily D. Leahy Guiney, of the Estate of Arthur Hamilton Leahy, Deceased v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1970
- Madden v. Mercantile-Safe Deposit & Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1971
- Madden v. MERC.-SAFE DEP. & TR. CO.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1971
- United States v. BaldwinCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1978
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.