Legal Opinion · Dissent

United States v. Moreno

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided September 23, 1955No. 5252Published

1DissentLatimer, Judge

I dissent.

There is not a great deal which can be added to the views expressed in my earlier opinion in this case, United States v Moreno, 5 USCMA 500, 18 CMR 124. All we accomplished by our previous holding was to delay the final day of reckoning. In its opinion presently before us, the board of review candidly acknowledged that the ruling we asked it to make was one that we should have made in the first instance. It said:

“The truth is that the basis of our decision may be either fact or law or it may partake of each or both. Certain it is, as the dissenting Judge has so forcibly indicated,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. BuntingUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1955
  2. Nat'l Bank of Honea Path v. Barrett Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1934
  3. United States v. MorenoUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1955
  4. United States v. BensonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1953
  5. Wong Kew ex rel. Wong Yook v. WardDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API