Legal Opinion

Bentrup v. Hoke

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided November 4, 1968No. 4720PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Lyle Brown, Justice.

Appellant Nell Bentrup, defendant below, was permanently enjoined from operating a beauty parlor in her home. The home is located in North Little Rock and in a zoned area restricted to residences limited to one, single family residential nse. The property is also covered by a bill of restrictive assurances. Appellees are neighboring property owners of Nell Bentrup.

Appellant’s right to use a portion of the residence as a beauty parlor must fail because of the application of res judicata. In 1965, the same neighboring property owners who brought this suit against Mrs.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Baumgartner v. RogersSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1961
  2. Langford v. GriffinSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1929
  3. Cook v. American Cyanamid Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1957
  4. Van Duyse v. FlemingSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1968

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Phelps v. Justiss Oil Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1987
  2. Harrison v. LoydCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2004
  3. Hays v. Cummins (In Re Cummins)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API