Bentrup v. Hoke
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Lyle Brown, Justice.
Appellant Nell Bentrup, defendant below, was permanently enjoined from operating a beauty parlor in her home. The home is located in North Little Rock and in a zoned area restricted to residences limited to one, single family residential nse. The property is also covered by a bill of restrictive assurances. Appellees are neighboring property owners of Nell Bentrup.
Appellant’s right to use a portion of the residence as a beauty parlor must fail because of the application of res judicata. In 1965, the same neighboring property owners who brought this suit against Mrs.…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Baumgartner v. RogersSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1961
- Langford v. GriffinSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1929
- Cook v. American Cyanamid Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1957
- Van Duyse v. FlemingSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1968
3Cited by3 opinions
- Phelps v. Justiss Oil Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1987
- Harrison v. LoydCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2004
- Hays v. Cummins (In Re Cummins)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1994