Legal Opinion
Feeney v. Authentic Fitness Co.
Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County
Decided February 15, 2001No. 3663Published
1Opinion of the Court
TEMIN, J.,
For the reasons stated in the attached amended findings of fact and conclusions of law, the court finds that the plaintiff’s post verdict motion was properly denied.
AMENDED FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
And now, February 15, 2001 the court enters the attached amended findings of fact and conclusions of law, incorporating herein the findings of fact and conclusions of law entered on April 20, 2000, as the opinion of the court.
PROCEDURAL HISTORY(1) This action was commenced on June 30,1994, by plaintiff against defendants Authentic Fitness Company and Gold Medal Sporting…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Sehl v. Vista Linen Rental Services Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
- Stanley J. Sochanski, in No. 82-1036 v. Sears, Roebuck and Company, and Cross-Appellant in No. 82-1037. And the Goodyear Tire and Rubber Co. v. John F. Solomon, Jr., Palmer Tire Company, Geneva Metal Wheels CoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1982