Legal Opinion

Michael v. Hill

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided May 24, 1972PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtHowell, J.

This is an action for damages for personal injuries. Plaintiff appeals from a judgment entered on a verdict for defendant.

The parties are in substantial agreement on the facts. As there is no dispute concerning the right of defendant Joseph Hill to drive his father’s vehicle, we shall refer to Joseph Hill as if he were the only defendant.

Plaintiff and defendant worked together for the Hnited States Forest Service at the Bear Springs Ranger Station near Mt. Hood. Defendant’s parents lived near Hood River. Plaintiff, defendant, and another friend, Kam Axford, who worked for the H. S. Forest…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Reed v. WilsonOregon Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Sylvia v. HelferOregon Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Guritz v. FosterOregon Supreme Court · 1967
  4. United States National Bank v. NjustOregon Supreme Court · 1971

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Fullerton v. WhiteOregon Supreme Court · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API