Legal Opinion
Toomey v. Young
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided December 9, 1977No. Civ. H-77-445PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION
NEWMAN, District Judge.
Petitioner, an inmate at Federal Correctional Institution, Danbury, seeks a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 alleging that the decision of the United States Parole Commission to revoke his mandatory release status is unlawful. A brief recitation of the facts will help illuminate the issues.
In August, 1970; petitioner began serving a five-year federal sentence imposed by the District of Massachusetts. On October 15, 1973, he was mandatorily released “as if on parole” pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 4164. Under the terms of the statute his…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Moody v. DaggettSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States Ex Rel. John Buono v. Frank F. Kenton, Warden, Federal Correctional Institution, Danbury, ConnecticutCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1961
- Gaddy v. MichaelCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1975
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Toomey v. YoungDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1978
- Paul E. Maslauskas, in No. 79-1845 v. U. S. Board of Parole, Paul E. Maslauskas, in No. 79-2139 v. Charles E. Fenton, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
- State Ex Rel. Cox v. State, Department of Health & Social ServicesCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1981
- Phillip H. Joiner v. Gary L. Henman, Warden, and United States Parole CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
- Toomey v. YoungCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1979
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.