Legal Opinion

Grand Rapids & Indiana Railway Co. v. Railroad Commission

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided June 29, 1906No. 3 Railroad CommissionPublishedCited by 3 opinions

Erom Railroad Commission of Indiana; Union B. Hunt, Chairman, William J. Wood and Charles V. McAdams, Commissioners. Petition by tbe Chicago & Erie Eailroad Company against the Grand Eapids & Indiana Eailway Company. From an order for petitioner, defendant and another appeal. (For denial of petition to transfer to Supreme Court, see 161 Ind. 214.)

1Opinion of the CourtRobinson, C. J.

The Chicago & Erie Eailroad Company filed its petition with the railroad commission against appellants, to require the' construction, maintenance and operation of an interlocking device at a crossing. The commission found in favor of the petitioner. From the order thus made by the commission, appellants have appealed to this court.

1. Under section six of the railroad commission act (Acts 1905, p.-83, §5405f Burns 1905), an appeal direct to this court is authorized only where the party in interest is dissatisfied with “any rate, classification, rule, charge, or general regulation made,…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Atchison, Topeka Santa Fe Railway Company v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
  2. Shawnee Gas & Electric Co. v. State Ex Rel. Shawnee City WaterworksSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  3. Grand Rapids & Indiana Railway Co. v. Railroad CommissionIndiana Supreme Court · 1906

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API